Dan Albas

Dan Albas is the Conservative member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola

In November of 2015, newly elected Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wrote an open letter to Canadians.

In that letter among other promises the PM offered this: “…we committed to set a higher bar for openness and transparency in Ottawa. Government and its information must be open by default. Simply put, it is time to shine more light on government to make sure it remains focused on the people it was created to serve — you.”

I believe these words the prime minister wrote to Canadians in 2015 are important and must be honoured. 

As the Official Opposition, it is also our role to hold the prime minister and his Liberal government accountable for these and other promises made to Canadians. Accountability is vital.

It is why, in 2006, former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper created the independent Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) to help hold your government accountable.

It should also be noted that the creation of the PBO was the result of a campaign promise made by former Harper to create more accountability in Ottawa, in response to the former Liberal government sponsorship scandal.

Why does this matter? 

Because accountability and transparency are under threat in Ottawa.

In 2018, the Trudeau government tabled a budget that included a $186.7 billion infrastructure spending plan.

What's deeply troubling is when the PBO requested the documents to review this infrastructure spending plan, no documents were provided.

As a result, in March of 2018 the PBO publicly reported: “Budget 2018 provides an incomplete account of the changes to the government’s $186.7 billion infrastructure spending plan. PBO requested the new plan but it does not exist.”

Fast forward to January 2020 and the Conservatives tabled an opposition day motion that is summarized as: “…given the PBO posted on March 15, 2018, that ‘Budget 2018 provides an incomplete account of the changes to the government’s $186.7 billion infrastructure spending plan’ and that the ‘PBO requested the new plan but it does not exist,’ the House call on the Auditor General of Canada to immediately conduct an audit of the government’s ‘Investing in Canada Plan.’”

Although the government vigorously opposed this motion, it passed with 166 votes in favour and 152 opposed. 

Now here we are three years after the PBO first raised the alarm bells, and the Auditor General recently released the audit (Report 9) of the “Investing in Canada” Infrastructure plan.

Unfortunately, the Auditor General also stated: “Overall, Infrastructure Canada — as the lead department for the Investing in Canada Plan — was unable to provide meaningful public reporting on the plan’s overall progress toward its expected results.”

Should this be acceptable conduct from your government?

Dan Albas is the member of Parliament for Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola. Email: Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca. Phone: 1-800-665-8711.